Witness the word to the left and know I really enjoy intelligent humor and I look forward to corresponding with you. I'm writing this very, very particularly to the Psychiatric and Medical Professionals, Clergy too, who want to have their questions answered by me. Is this a wee bit tongue-in-cheek, yes, and that doesn't make it any less true:
Yes, I have been officially diagnosed with Aspergers. Yes, I do know that to be my true and accurate diagnosis. Yes, I am more than willing to talk about it, to write about it, in fact, if you're interested in a Case Study, I can, quite literally, hand you the hard drives, a decade in the stream of my consciousness.
(If you like, I can even hand you a new paradigm in philosophical and psychological thought based on the Bell Curve. That Curve has never been negative or positive and there is most definitely a value beyond the tails. I digress and that's not unusual.)
I have learned, arguably as an NT survival technique, in anything I publically write, to leave my words open for YOUR interpretation. In the Poker Hands of your paradigms, it’s your
interpretation that's your “tell”.
That said, my "Rules of Engagement" are far too important to chance to your interpretation. I’ve included a Rule translation in brackets for those of you who might be shakin' your heads, wondering "what does she mean by that?". AND in my “Aspergers Humor”, for those of you who are still serving “negativity”, I've included a Note:
My Rules for Engagement:
(1) I am your colleague, differently.
(I am not anyone's patient; I'm not anyone's client, do not treat me as though I am.)
Note: I am not your inferior.
(2) My “Aspergers” is questionable, i.e. open for discussion.
(My Aspergers is not debatable until I read a big diagnostic difference in DSM.)
Note: If you do not understand the difference between questionable and debatable do not contact me.
(3) My "Heyoka Walking the Visionary Path" is the same real as your "Aspergers" diagnosis.
(I will not be criticized for my understanding, I am happy to share it.)
Note: If you do not understand the difference between criticizing me and challenging me, do not contact me.
(4) I welcome your questions.
(I reserve the right to refuse to answer you, personally or publically.)
Note: You could be thrown to the Wolves of my readers.
Thank you . . . can you tell I'm just a wee bit leary of you, all of you? Trust me when I tell you, I have my reasons and they are valid.
(If you like, I can even hand you a new paradigm in philosophical and psychological thought based on the Bell Curve. That Curve has never been negative or positive and there is most definitely a value beyond the tails. I digress and that's not unusual.)
I have learned, arguably as an NT survival technique, in anything I publically write, to leave my words open for YOUR interpretation. In the Poker Hands of your paradigms, it’s your
interpretation that's your “tell”.
That said, my "Rules of Engagement" are far too important to chance to your interpretation. I’ve included a Rule translation in brackets for those of you who might be shakin' your heads, wondering "what does she mean by that?". AND in my “Aspergers Humor”, for those of you who are still serving “negativity”, I've included a Note:
My Rules for Engagement:
(1) I am your colleague, differently.
(I am not anyone's patient; I'm not anyone's client, do not treat me as though I am.)
Note: I am not your inferior.
(2) My “Aspergers” is questionable, i.e. open for discussion.
(My Aspergers is not debatable until I read a big diagnostic difference in DSM.)
Note: If you do not understand the difference between questionable and debatable do not contact me.
(3) My "Heyoka Walking the Visionary Path" is the same real as your "Aspergers" diagnosis.
(I will not be criticized for my understanding, I am happy to share it.)
Note: If you do not understand the difference between criticizing me and challenging me, do not contact me.
(4) I welcome your questions.
(I reserve the right to refuse to answer you, personally or publically.)
Note: You could be thrown to the Wolves of my readers.
Thank you . . . can you tell I'm just a wee bit leary of you, all of you? Trust me when I tell you, I have my reasons and they are valid.
RSS Feed
